#Cyberlux 8 Crack Rar File
#Cyberlux 8 Registration Details As

Cyberlux 8 Registration Details As

All SEC registration details as well as a list of all documents (S-1, Prospectus, Current Reports, 8-K, 10K, Annual Reports) filed by Cyberlux Corp.Plaintiffs, AJW Partners, LLC, AJW Offshore, LTD, AJW Qualified Partners, LLC, New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC, and AJW Master Fund, LTD (collectively 'AJW') moves this Court for: (1) a preliminary injunction (Seq. -Des fois mme le pc client ' plante '. L ou j'ai un problme -C' est au niveau de la remise en route du pc client partir du pc serveur lorsqu'un client c' est dconnect. Sur le pc serveur nous avons bien les 10 pc qui apparaissent connects. -Sur les 10 pc clients j'ai install Cyberlux client -et sur le pc serveur, Cyberlux serveur.

Cyberlux 8 Crack Rar File

Cyberlux 8 5 3 Cyberlux 6.6 free download listing - Cyberlux 6.6 warez download, Cyberlux 6.6 serial, Cyberlux 6.6 serial crack, Cyberlux 6.6 crack, Cyberlux 6.6. Both motions are consolidated for disposition.Cyberlux 8 5 3 Crack Rar file - okbosecha.cf. 002), pursuant to CPLR В§ 3211(a)(1) and (a)(7), Cyberlux's counterclaims 1 through 3, and 5 through 9.

Check out CYBL latest annual and quarterly financial reports. Cyberlux's common stock is registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and its shares are traded publicly.Q1Q2Q3Q4 represent three-month periodic financial reports. Cyberlux is a Nevada corporation which designs, manufactures and sells light emitting diode (LED) lighting systems. AJW are investors that loaned over $6 million to Cyberlux over a three year period. Location of This Business 2933 S Miami Blvd STE 122, Durham, NC 27703-9041 Email this. Cyberlux Corporation manufactures and sells a variety of light emitting diode products.

Cyberlux filed counterclaims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion, declaratory judgment on the issue of usury, and for an injunction.AJW seeks a preliminary injunction directing Cyberlux to honor its contractual obligation to deliver shares of stock to AJW to be sold in the marketplace, with proceeds to be held in escrow pending further direction by this Court.In order to be entitled to a preliminary injunction, a movant must clearly demonstrate (1) a likelihood of success on the merits, (2) irreparable injury absent granting of the preliminary injunction, and (3) a balancing of the equities in the movant's favor. Cyberlux has failed to honor either notice.AJW filed an action asserting claims, among others, for breach of contract. On February 7, 2008, AJW delivered notices of conversion converting 3 million shares at. The stock has established itself as among the top most traded stocks in small caps with daily dollar volume regularly in In addition to the Agreements, the Notes also set forth conditions, rights, and obligations of the parties.Under the Notes, AJW has the right to convert the outstanding principal amount into common stock by submitting notices of conversion to Cyberlux.On August 10, 2007, AJW delivered notices of conversion in the amount of 23,563,213 shares at $.0008 per share. Additionally, between April 2005 and July 2007, AJW purchased Notes from Cyberlux worth approximately $4.62 million.Cyberlux Corporation (OTC: CYBL) has made a powerful run up the charts in recent weeks since we first reported on it in July when it was under a penny to recent highs of 0.066. You can analyze Cyberlux recent business situations by check its cash flow statements, balance sheets, income statements and other tables.In September 2004, the parties entered into Securities Purchase Agreements (the 'Agreements') whereby Cyberlux issued callable Secured Convertible Notes (the 'Notes') to AJW in the aggregate principal amount of $1,500,000.

First, Cyberlux has a viable product that it has the ability to sell and has sold. On this basis, that court determined that the plaintiff had demonstrated irreparable harm.In this case, Cyberlux's situation, although not ideal, is clearly distinguishable from the defendant in Alpha Capital. Further, defendant's registration statement indicated that it may never be able to sell its product commercially. However, in Alpha Capital, defendant's own registration statement stated that it had no source of product revenue, and that it anticipated that its deficit ($46,364,951), would only increase. See Alpha Capital Aktiengesellschaft v Advanced Viral Research Corp., 2003 WL 328302 (SDNY 2003).In Alpha Capital, the Southern District granted an injunction based on the reasoning that 'irreparable harm exists where nothing in the record suggests that a defendant will be able to pay a judgment.' Id at 2.

The motion must be denied if from the pleadings' four corners 'factual allegations are discerned which taken together manifest any cause of action cognizable at law.' 511 W. Whether a plaintiff can ultimately establish its allegations is not part of the calculus in determining a motion to dismiss. Therefore, AJW fails to satisfy that it will suffer irreparable harm, and the motion for preliminary injunction must be denied.'Dismissal under CPLR 3211(a)(1) is warranted only if the documentary evidence submitted conclusively established a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law.'' Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 (1994).When assessing the adequacy of a complaint on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), a court must afford the pleadings a liberal construction, accept the allegations of the complaint as true, and provide the plaintiff 'the benefit of every possible favorable inference.' Id. Therefore, Cyberlux, although is currently operating at a loss, it cannot be adequately shown, as AJW suggests, that Cyberlux is approaching insolvency , or that there is a 'substantial likelihood that defendant will not be able to satisfy a judgment at the conclusion of this case.' Alpha Capital at 5. Further, Cyberlux has product orders from the Nation Guard worth approximately $663,000.

Id at 318.Furthermore, a claim of fraudulent inducement of a contract is defectively pled if the acts alleged to constitute fraud 'do not arise from circumstances extraneous to, and not constituting elements of, the contract, and therefore do not represent the breach of a legal duty independent of the contract.' Baker v Norman, 226 AD2d 301, 304 (1st Dept), appeal dismissed, 88 NY2d 1040 (1996). The Court of Appeals has held that general allegations that a defendant entered into a contract while lacking the intent to perform it are insufficient to state a cause of action for fraud. Here, such a misrepresentation is not a basis for a fraud claim. Co., 87 NY2d 308, 318 (1995).Cyberlux alleges that AJW 'materially misrepresented that they would act in good faith and not employ fraudulent means for self-gain in its execution of the transactions agreement.' Answer В¶ 56. First Counterclaim вЂ” FraudThe elements required for a fraud cause of action are 'representation of a material existing fact, falsity, scienter, deception and injury.' New York Univ.

Cyberlux alleges that in violation of the Notes, AJW converted shares representing more than 4.99% of the total outstanding shares of stock. Therefore, in light of the plain contractual language disavowing a fiduciary relationship, the counterclaim for breach of fiduciary duty must be dismissed.The fifth counterclaim is for breach of contract. Here, the Agreements clearly state that 'no buyer is acting as a financial advisor or fiduciary to the Company (or in any similar capacity) with respect to this agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.' Agreements, Section 3(o). V Credit Lyonnais, 270 AD2d 138, 139 (1st Dept 2000) (affirming the dismissal of a breach of fiduciary duty claim where the parties represented in the contracts that each 'is a sophisticated institutional investor' that 'has acted in the capacity of an arm's-length contractual counter-party and not as financial advisor or fiduciary'). See Answer В¶В¶ 60-64.As to breach of fiduciary duty, contrary to the allegations, no relation of confidence or trust arises when parties deal in arm's length transactions. Here, no such allegation is set forth to support the claim for negligent misrepresentation.